Sir,
We read this paper with interest, particularly in light of several other reports1-4
of poor radiological outcomes.
We were especially interested in the accuracy of the definitions
used for radiological failure of the prosthesis. The paper quotes the
Barrack classification5 for cement mantle grading, yet goes on to state
that a stem with a lateral cortical perforation was graded ‘A’. A grade
‘A’ cement mantle as defined by Barrack requires "a so-called ‘white-out’
at the cement-bone interface"5 which is not possible with a cortical
perforation.
The radiographs given as examples in the paper of a well fixed and
surviving stem also give us concern. In the right hip there is a
prosthesis-cement radiolucent line in all zones on the AP and lateral
views. There also appears to be a cement fracture in zone 2. The left stem
has cement-prosthesis radiolucencies in zones 1 and 7 and hypertrophy in
zone 3. It is impossible to compare with the post-operative films, and the
quality of the images once reproduced is poor. The right stem would definitely be loose and the left probably loose according to Harris.6
We were confused as to how the calculation of radiographic success
was made. Table II states that 46 hips were observed to have osteolysis. The
radiographic survivorship rate for both components is quoted as 99.5%. The
paper reports five patients (two fractures round a loose stem, two
radiographically loose stems, one with significant osteolysis) where the
intention to treat was revision. At best this makes a radiographic survival rate of 97.4%.
The authors conclude good outcomes for the case series, however, the
radiographs shown do not support this conclusion, and we have concerns
over the statistical reporting.
B. Ollivere, MRCS,
Specialist Registrar,
C. Darrah, RGN Dip Sci,
Research Co-ordinator and Clinical Nurse Practitioner,
N. Walton, FRCS,
Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon,
Institute of Orthopaedics,
Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust,
Norfolk, UK.
1. Livingston SJ, Ivory JP. Five year survivorship study of the
Charnley Elite Plus total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B(Suppl 1):59-60.
2. Walton NP, Darrah C, Shepstone L, Donell ST, Phillips H. The Elite
Plus arthroplasty: the need for radiological surveillance. J Bone Joint
Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:458-62.
3. Rowsell M, Der Tavitian J, Birtwistle S, Power R. Survivorship of
the Charnley Elite Plus cemented femoral stem. Int Orthop 2005;29:214-18.
4. Hauptfleisch J, Glyn-Jones S, Beard DJ, Gill HS, Murray DW. The
premature failure of the Charnley Elite Plus stem. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]
2006;88-B:179-83.
5. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD Jr, Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques
and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty: a
12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992;74-B:385-9.
6. Harris WH, McCarthy JC Jr, O’Neill DA. Femoral component loosening
using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J Bone Joint
Surg [Am] 1982;64-A:1063-7.