Sir,
We read this paper with interest. The study raised the
debate about whether the current overzealous use of volar locking plates for
management of these fractures is based on any validated patient-derived
outcome measures. We strongly agree with the authors' view on this issue that
there is no robust evidence that surgical management of fractures of the
distal radius will produce consistently better long-term results.
Downing and Karantana have mentioned a few studies on volar locking
plates with overall complication rates varying between 8% and 27%. These
studies have included direct (metalwork-related) and indirect (soft tissue
problems due to metalwork) complications secondary to volar locking
plates. None of the studies separately mention the re-operation rate
for metalwork complications.
We audited 114 distal radius fractures treated with volar locking
plating in 2007 at our hospital in the United Kingdom. In our series, 12 cases
(10%) underwent further surgery for metalwork-related complications
mainly for screw protrusion into the radiocarpal joint following fracture
collapse (eight cases). In two cases, the metaphyseal screws loosened
and backed out. There were two cases where tendon problems were observed
due to irritation by the metalwork requiring its removal. Our
results suggest that volar locking plates are associated with a high rate
of metalwork-related complications requiring further surgery. These
complications must be taken into account in deciding which implant to be
used. We feel that for a common fracture such as that of the distal radius
an ideal implant should be easy to use and have a low complication
rate.
We would welcome the authors’ comments on this point.
A. Sahu,
Clinical Research Fellow,
C.P. Charalambous,
M.J. Ravenscroft,
Stepping Hill Hospital,
Stockport, Manchester, UK.