|
Electronic Letters to:
-
- Knee:
R. W. Trickett, P. Hodgson, M. C. Forster, and A. Robertson
- The reliability and accuracy of digital templating in total knee replacement
J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91-B: 903-906
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Electronic letters published:
-
Authors' reply:
- Ryan W Trickett, Paul Hodgson, Mark C. Forster, and Angus Robertson.
(16 September 2009)
-
The reliability and accuracy of digital templating in total knee replacement
- Chris Hoare, Alistair Tindall, Samuel Orakwe
(7 August 2009)
|
Authors' reply: |
16 September 2009 |
|
|
Ryan W Trickett, Specialty Registrar Trauma & Orthopaedics Cardiff & Vale Orthopaedic Centre, Cardiff, Paul Hodgson, Mark C. Forster, and Angus Robertson.
Send letter to journal:
Re: Authors' reply:
ryan{at}trickett00.fsnet.co.uk Ryan W Trickett, et al.
|
Sir,
We read the comments from Hoare et al with interest and we thank them for their letter. The templating process was the
same for both senior authors (MF and AR). The femoral components were
templated using both the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs. However, where
conflict between the radiographs existed, preference was given to the
lateral radiograph as the key element of sizing the femoral component is
not to overstuff the patellofemoral joint or notch the femur. We did find
that the lack of congruence of the femoral condyles often led to a
compromise in the templating of the most appropriate size. This appeared
to be due to the larger distal radius of the lateral femoral condyle. We
found that the lack of congruence was primarily concerned with the
anterior and distal projection of the femoral condyles.
All of the patients in our study who were felt to have had an
oversized implant inserted were analysed separately. We postulated that
the reason for the oversized femoral component had been a variance in the
ML:AP ratio of the distal femur. It is recognised that there is a subgroup
of patients, usually females, in whom this ratio varies. These patients
were analysed separately to determine the accuracy of templating in this
group - four from five patients had been correctly templated. It is likely that
the altered distal femoral ratio is implicated in the correct (compared
with implanted) templating of an oversized femoral component. Gender-specific knee implant systems may have a role in this group of patients.
R.W. Trickett,
SpR Trauma & Orthopaedics,
P. Hodgson,
M.C. Forster,
A. Robertson,
Cardiff & Vale Orthopaedic Centre,
Cardiff, UK. |
|
The reliability and accuracy of digital templating in total knee replacement |
7 August 2009 |
|
|
Chris Hoare, Speciality Registrar, Trauma and Orthopaedics Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woolwich, London, Alistair Tindall, Samuel Orakwe
Send letter to journal:
Re: The reliability and accuracy of digital templating in total knee replacement
chrishoare{at}doctors.org.uk Chris Hoare, et al.
|
Sir,
We read this paper with interest. The authors state that the femoral component was consistently templated less accurately than the
tibial component and suggest difficulty in assessing the osseous landmarks
due to differing outlines of the medial and lateral femoral condyles on
the lateral radiograph as an explanation.
We feel the position of the posterior femoral condyles in relation to
one another does have an impact on the accuracy of templating for the
femoral component. In an unpublished study of 135 total knee replacements
in our institution, lack of congruency of the posterior femoral condyles
had a negative impact on the accuracy of templating.
We would be interested to know whether the authors took the templated
size of femoral component from the antero-posterior (AP) or lateral
radiographs. It is not stated in the text and the article shows images of
both AP and lateral radiographs with templated femoral components. The
authors have also suggested there may be a subgroup of patients for whom
the AP and medio-lateral dimensions of the distal femoral differ from the
general population.
We would be grateful to hear the authors' response to this.
C. Hoare,
Speciality Registrar, Trauma and Orthopaedics,
A. Tindall, S. Orakwe,
Queen Elizabeth Hospital,
Woolwich, London, UK. |
|
|