<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk">
<title>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume Hip</title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk</link>
<description>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume RSS feed -- recent Hip articles</description>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0301-620X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/839?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/847?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/852?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/858?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/708?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/715?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/724?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/731?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/556?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/562?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/570?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/574?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/579?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/424?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/430?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/436?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/442?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume</title>
<url>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/839?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] The determination of linear and angular penetration of the femoral head into the acetabular component as an assessment of wear in total hip replacement: A COMPARISON OF FOUR COMPUTER-ASSISTED METHODS]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/839?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We have compared four computer-assisted methods to measure penetration of the femoral head into the acetabular component in total hip replacement. These were the Martell Hip Analysis suite 7.14, Rogan HyperOrtho, Rogan View Pro-X and Roman v1.70. The images used for the investigation comprised 24 anteroposterior digital radiographs and 24 conventional acetate radiographs which were scanned to provide digital images. These radiographs were acquired from 24 patients with an uncemented total hip replacement with a follow-up of approximately eight years (mean 8.1; 6.3 to 9.1). Each image was measured twice by two blinded observers. The mean annual rates of penetration of the femoral head measured in the eight-year single image analysis were: Martell, 0.24 (SD 0.19); HyperOrtho, 0.12 (SD 0.08); View Pro-X, 0.12 (SD 0.06); Roman, 0.12 (SD 0.07). In paired analysis of the six-month and eight-year radiographs: Martell, 0.35 (SD 0.22); HyperOrtho, 0.15 (SD 0.13); View Pro-X, 0.11 (SD 0.06); Roman, 0.11 (SD 0.07). The intra- and inter-observer variability for the paired analysis was best for View Pro-X and Roman software, with intraclass correlations of 0.97, 0.87 and 0.96, 0.87, respectively, and worst for HyperOrtho and Martell, with intraclass correlations of 0.46, 0.13 and 0.33, 0.39, respectively.</p>
<p>The Roman method proved the most precise and the most easy to use in clinical practice and the software is available free of charge. The Martell method showed the lowest precision, indicating a problem with its edge detection algorithm on digital images.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geerdink, C. H., Grimm, B., Vencken, W., Heyligers, I. C., Tonino, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20305</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] The determination of linear and angular penetration of the femoral head into the acetabular component as an assessment of wear in total hip replacement: A COMPARISON OF FOUR COMPUTER-ASSISTED METHODS]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>846</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>839</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/847?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/847?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We report 17 patients (20 hips) in whom metal-on-metal resurfacing had been performed and who presented with various symptoms and a soft-tissue mass which we termed a pseudotumour. Each patient underwent plain radiography and in some, CT, MRI and ultrasonography were also performed. In addition, histological examination of available samples was undertaken.</p>
<p>All the patients were women and their presentation was variable. The most common symptom was discomfort in the region of the hip. Other symptoms included spontaneous dislocation, nerve palsy, a noticeable mass or a rash. The common histological features were extensive necrosis and lymphocytic infiltration. To date, 13 of the 20 hips have required revision to a conventional hip replacement. Two are awaiting revision.</p>
<p>We estimate that approximately 1% of patients who have a metal-on-metal resurfacing develop a pseudotumour within five years. The cause is unknown and is probably multifactorial. There may be a toxic reaction to an excess of particulate metal wear debris or a hypersensitivity reaction to a normal amount of metal debris. We are concerned that with time the incidence of these pseudotumours may increase. Further investigation is required to define their cause.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pandit, H., Glyn-Jones, S., McLardy-Smith, P., Gundle, R., Whitwell, D., Gibbons, C. L. M., Ostlere, S., Athanasou, N., Gill, H. S., Murray, D. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20213</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>851</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>847</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/852?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] Elevated intraosseous pressure in the intertrochanteric region is associated with poorer results in osteonecrosis of the femoral head treated by multiple drilling]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/852?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Multiple drilling is reported to be an effective treatment for osteonecrosis of the head of femur, but its effect on intra-osseous pressure has not been described. We undertook multiple drilling and recorded the intra-osseous pressure in 75 osteonecrotic hips in 60 patients with a mean age of 42 years (19 to 67). At a mean follow-up of 37.1 months (24 to 60), 42 hips (56%) had a clinically successful outcome. The procedure was effective in reducing the mean intra-osseous pressure from 57 mmHg (SD 22) to 16 mmHg (SD 9). Hips with a successful outcome had a mean pressure of 26 mmHg (SD 19). It was less effective in preventing progression of osteonecrosis in hips with considerable involvement and in those with a high intra-osseous pressure in the intertrochanteric region (mean 45 mmHg (SD 25)). This study is not able to answer whether a return of the intra-osseous pressure to normal levels is required for satisfactory healing.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, M. S., Hsieh, P.-H., Chang, Y.-H., Chan, Y.-S., Agrawal, S., Ueng, S. W. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] Elevated intraosseous pressure in the intertrochanteric region is associated with poorer results in osteonecrosis of the femoral head treated by multiple drilling]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>857</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>852</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/858?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] Closed reduction with traction for developmental dysplasia of the hip in children aged between one and five years]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/7/858?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip diagnosed after the first year of life remains controversial. A series of 36 children (47 hips), aged between one and 4.9 years underwent gradual closed reduction using the Petit-Morel method. A pelvic osteotomy was required in 43 hips (91.5%). The patients whose hips did not require pelvic osteotomy were among the youngest. The mean age at final follow-up was 16.1 years (11.3 to 32). The mean follow-up was 14.3 years (10 to 30).</p>
<p>At the latest follow-up, 44 hips (93.6%) were graded as excellent or good according to the Severin classification. Closed reduction failed in only two hips (4.3%) which then required open reduction. Mild avascular necrosis was observed in one (2.1%).</p>
<p>The accuracy of the reduction and associated low complication rate justify the use of the Petit-Morel technique as the treatment of choice for developmental dysplasia of the hip in patients aged between one and five years.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rampal, V., Sabourin, M., Erdeneshoo, E., Koureas, G., Seringe, R., Wicart, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B7.20041</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] Closed reduction with traction for developmental dysplasia of the hip in children aged between one and five years]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>7</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>863</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>858</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/708?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in developmental dysplasia: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/708?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing was performed for developmental dysplasia in 96 hips in 85 patients, 78 in women and 18 in men, with a mean age at the time of surgery of 43 years (14 to 65). These cases were matched for age, gender, operating surgeon and date of operation with a group of patients with primary osteoarthritis who had been treated by resurfacing, to provide a control group of 96 hips (93 patients). A clinical and radiological follow-up study was performed. The dysplasia group were followed for a mean of 4.4 years (2.0 to 8.5) and the osteoarthritis group for a mean of 4.5 years (2.2 to 9.4). Of the dysplasia cases, 17 (18%) were classified as Crowe grade III or IV.</p>
<p>There were five (5.2%) revisions in the dysplasia group and none in the osteoarthritic patients. Four of the failures were due to acetabular loosening and the other sustained a fracture of the neck of femur. There was a significant difference in survival between the two groups (p = 0.02). The five-year survival was 96.7% (95% confidence interval 90.0 to 100) for the dysplasia group and 100% (95% confidence interval 100 to 100) for the osteoarthritic group. There was no significant difference in the median Oxford hip score between the two groups at any time during the study.</p>
<p>The medium-term results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in all grades of developmental dysplasia are encouraging, although they are significantly worse than in a group of matched patients with osteoarthritis treated in the same manner.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McBryde, C. W., Shears, E., O'Hara, J. N., Pynsent, P. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.20026</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in developmental dysplasia: A CASE-CONTROL STUDY]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>714</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>708</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/715?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: A SIX- TO 9.6-YEAR FOLLOW-UP]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/715?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The dysplasia cup, which was devised as an adjunct to the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system, has a hydroxyapatite-coated porous surface and two supplementary neutralisation screws to provide stable primary fixation, permit early weight-bearing, and allow incorporation of morcellised autograft without the need for structural bone grafting.</p>
<p>A total of 110 consecutive dysplasia resurfacing arthroplasties in 103 patients (55 men and 48 women) performed between 1997 and 2000 was reviewed with a minimum follow-up of six years. The mean age at operation was 47.2 years (21 to 62) and 104 hips (94%) were Crowe grade II or III.</p>
<p>During the mean follow-up of 7.8 years (6 to 9.6), three hips (2.7%) were converted to a total hip replacement at a mean of 3.9 years (2 months to 8.1 years), giving a cumulative survival of 95.2% at nine years (95% confidence interval 89 to 100). The revisions were due to a fracture of the femoral neck, a collapse of the femoral head and a deep infection. There was no aseptic loosening or osteolysis of the acetabular component associated with either of the revisions performed for failure of the femoral component. No patient is awaiting a revision.</p>
<p>The median Oxford hip score in 98 patients with surviving hips at the final review was 13 and the 10th and the 90th percentiles were 12 and 23, respectively.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[McMinn, D. J. W., Daniel, J., Ziaee, H., Pradhan, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.19875</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing dysplasia component in severe acetabular insufficiency: A SIX- TO 9.6-YEAR FOLLOW-UP]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>723</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>715</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/724?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] Evaluation of two surgical techniques for acetabular reconstruction in total hip replacement for congenital hip disease: RESULTS AFTER A MINIMUM TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/724?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We have evaluated the results of total hip replacement in patients with congenital hip disease using 46 cemented all-polyethylene Charnley acetabular components implanted with the cotyloplasty technique in 34 patients (group A), and compared them with 47 metal-backed cementless acetabular components implanted without bone grafting in 33 patients (group B). Patients in group A were treated between 1988 and 1993 and those in group B between 1990 and 1995. The mean follow-up for group A was 16.6 years (12 to 18) and the mean follow-up for group B was 13.4 years (10 to 16).</p>
<p>Revision for aseptic loosening was undertaken in 15 hips (32.6%) in group A and in four hips (8.5%) in group B. When liner exchange was included, a total of 13 hips were revised in group B (27.7%). The mean polyethylene wear was 0.11 mm/yr (0.002 to 0.43) and 0.107 mm/yr (0 to 0.62) for groups A and B, respectively. Polyethylene wear in group A was associated with linear osteolysis, and in group B with expansile osteolysis.</p>
<p>In patients with congenital hip disease, when 80% cover of the implant can be obtained, a cementless acetabular component appears to be acceptable and provides durable fixation. However, because of the type of osteolysis arising with these devices, early exchange of a worn liner is recommended before extensive bone loss makes revision surgery more complicated.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hartofilakidis, G., Georgiades, G., Babis, G. C., Yiannakopoulos, C. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.20490</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] Evaluation of two surgical techniques for acetabular reconstruction in total hip replacement for congenital hip disease: RESULTS AFTER A MINIMUM TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>730</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>724</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/731?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] Tribological and material analyses of retrieved alumina and zirconia ceramic heads correlated with polyethylene wear after total hip replacement]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/6/731?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>It has been suggested that the wear of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total hip replacement is substantially reduced when the femoral head is ceramic rather than metal. However, studies of alumina and zirconia ceramic femoral heads on the penetration of an UHMWPE liner <I>in vivo</I> have given conflicting results.</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to examine the surface characteristics of 30 alumina and 24 zirconia ceramic femoral heads and to identify any phase transformation in the zirconia heads. We also studied the penetration rate of alumina and zirconia heads into contemporary UHMWPE liners. The alumina heads had been implanted for a mean of 11.3 years (8.1 to 16.2) and zirconia heads for a mean of 9.8 years (7.5 to 15).</p>
<p>The mean surface roughness values of the explanted alumina heads (Ra 40.12 nm and Rpm 578.34 nm) were similar to those for the explanted zirconia heads (Ra 36.21 nm and Rpm 607.34 nm). The mean value of the monoclinic phase of two control zirconia heads was 1% (0.8% to 1.5%) and 1.2% (0.9% to 1.3%), respectively. The mean value of the monoclinic phase of 24 explanted zirconia heads was 7.3% (1% to 26%).</p>
<p>In the alumina group, the mean linear penetration rate of the UMWPE liner was 0.10 mm/yr (0.09 to 0.12) in hips with low Ra and Rpm values (13.22 nm and 85.91 nm, respectively). The mean linear penetration rate of the UHMWPE liner was 0.13 mm/yr (0.07 to 0.23) in hips with high Ra and Rpm values (198.72 nm and 1329 nm, respectively). This difference was significant (p = 0.041).</p>
<p>In the zirconia head group, the mean linear penetration rate of the UHMWPE liner was 0.09 mm/yr (0.07 to 0.14) in hips with low Ra and Rpm values (12.78 nm and 92.99 nm, respectively). The mean linear penetration rate of the UHMWPE liner was 0.12 mm/yr (0.08 to 0.22) in hips with high Ra and Rpm values (199.21 nm and 1381 nm, respectively). This difference was significant (p = 0.039).</p>
<p>The explanted zirconia heads which had a minimal phase transformation had similar surface roughness and a similar penetration rate of UHMWPE liner as the explanted alumina head.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, Y.-H., Kim, J.-S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-06-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B6.20540</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] Tribological and material analyses of retrieved alumina and zirconia ceramic heads correlated with polyethylene wear after total hip replacement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>737</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>731</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/556?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: A THREE-YEAR RANDOMISED, CONTROLLED TRIAL USING RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/556?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The creep and wear behaviour of highly cross-linked polyethylene and standard polyethylene liners were examined in a prospective, double-blind randomised, controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis.</p>
<p>We randomised 54 patients to receive hip replacements with either highly cross-linked polyethylene or standard liners and determined the three-dimensional penetration of the liners over three years.</p>
<p>After three years the mean total penetration was 0.35 mm (SD 0.14) for the highly cross-linked polyethylene group and 0.45 mm (SD 0.19) for the standard group. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.0184). From the pattern of penetration it was possible to discriminate creep from wear. Most (95%) of the creep occurred within six months of implantation and nearly all within the first year. There was no difference in the mean degree of creep between the two types of polyethylene (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.26 mm, SD 0.17; standard 0.27 mm, SD 0.2; p = 0.83). There was, however, a significant difference (p = 0.012) in the mean wear rate (highly cross-linked polyethylene 0.03 mm/yr, SD 0.06; standard 0.07 mm/yr, SD 0.05). Creep and wear occurred in significantly different directions (p = 0.01); creep was predominantly proximal whereas wear was anterior, proximal and medial.</p>
<p>We conclude that penetration in the first six months is creep-dominated, but after one year virtually all penetration is due to wear. Highly cross-linked polyethylene has a 60% lower rate of wear than standard polyethylene and therefore will probably perform better in the long term.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glyn-Jones, S., McLardy-Smith, P., Gill, H. S., Murray, D. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20545</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] The creep and wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene: A THREE-YEAR RANDOMISED, CONTROLLED TRIAL USING RADIOSTEREOMETRIC ANALYSIS]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>561</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>556</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/562?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] Multimodal thromboprophylaxis following primary hip arthroplasty: THE ROLE OF ADJUVANT INTERMITTENT PNEUMATIC CALF COMPRESSION]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/562?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We report a retrospective review of the incidence of venous thromboembolism in 463 consecutive patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty (487 procedures). Treatment included both total hip replacement and hip resurfacing, and the patients were managed without anticoagulants. The thromboprophylaxis regimen included an antiplatelet agent, generally aspirin, hypotensive epidural anaesthesia, elastic compression stockings and early mobilisation. In 258 of these procedures (244 patients) performed in 2005 (cohort A) mechanical compression devices were not used, whereas in 229 (219 patients) performed during 2006 (cohort B) bilateral intermittent pneumatic calf compression was used.</p>
<p>All operations were performed through a posterior mini-incision approach. Patients who required anticoagulation for pre-existing medical problems and those undergoing revision arthroplasty were excluded. Doppler ultrasonographic screening for deep-vein thrombosis was performed in all patients between the fourth and sixth post-operative days. All patients were reviewed at a follow-up clinic six to ten weeks after the operation. In addition, reponse to a questionnaire was obtained at the end of 12 weeks post-operatively.</p>
<p>No symptomatic calf or above-knee deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism occurred. In 25 patients in cohort A (10.2%) and in ten patients in cohort B (4.6%) asymptomatic calf deep-vein thromboses were detected ultrasonographically. This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.03). The regimen followed by cohort B offers the prospect of a low incidence of venous thromboembolism without subjecting patients to the higher risk of bleeding associated with anticoagulant use.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel, J., Pradhan, A., Pradhan, C., Ziaee, H., Moss, M., Freeman, J., McMinn, D. J. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.19744</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] Multimodal thromboprophylaxis following primary hip arthroplasty: THE ROLE OF ADJUVANT INTERMITTENT PNEUMATIC CALF COMPRESSION]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>569</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>562</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/570?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] A ten-year follow-up of the Reflection cementless acetabular component]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/570?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We reviewed the long-term results at ten to 12 years of 118 total hip replacements in 109 patients using a second-generation hemispherical cementless acetabular component (Reflection) designed to address the problem of backside wear. Five patients (five hips) died and six patients (seven hips) were lost to follow-up. The remaining 98 patients (106 hips) had a mean age of 62.9 years (34.0 to 86.2) A rate of revision for aseptic loosening of 0.9%, and predictable results were found with respect to radiological evidence of fixation, lack of pain, walking ability, range of movement and function. One component was revised for aseptic loosening, and of the 101 hips (95.2%) that did not have a revision, minor osteolytic lesions of the pelvis were seen in six (5.9%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the total cohort of 118 hips revealed a 96.4% survival at both ten (95% confidence interval 90 to 98) and 12 years (95% confidence interval 86 to 98).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Civinini, R., D'Arienzo, M., Innocenti, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.20116</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] A ten-year follow-up of the Reflection cementless acetabular component]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>573</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>570</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/574?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/574?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Between 1980 and 2000, 63 support rings were used in the management of acetabular deficiency in a series of 60 patients, with a mean follow-up of 8.75 years (2 months to 23.8 years). There was a minimum five-year follow-up for successful reconstructions. The indication for revision surgery was aseptic loosening in 30 cases and infection in 33. All cases were Paprosky III defects; IIIA in 33 patients (52.4%) and IIIB in 30 (47.6%), including four with pelvic dissociation. A total of 26 patients (43.3%) have died since surgery, and 34 (56.7%) remain under clinical review. With acetabular revision for infection or aseptic loosening as the definition of failure, we report success in 53 (84%) of the reconstructions. A total of 12 failures (19%) required further surgery, four (6.3%) for aseptic loosening of the acetabular construct, six (9.5%) for recurrent infection and two (3.2%) for recurrent dislocation requiring captive components. Complications, seen in 11 patients (18.3%), included six femoral or sciatic neuropraxias which all resolved, one grade III heterotopic ossification, one on-table acetabular revision for instability, and three early post-operative dislocations managed by manipulation under anaesthesia, with no further instability.</p>
<p>We recommend support rings and morcellised bone graft for significant acetabular bone deficiency that cannot be reconstructed using mesh.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carroll, F. A., Hoad-Reddick, D. A., Kerry, R. M., Stockley, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.19789</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] The survival of support rings in complex acetabular revision surgery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>578</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>574</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/579?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] Inter- and intra-observer variability of the Crowe and Hartofilakidis classification systems for congenital hip disease in adults]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/5/579?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Our study evaluated the reliability of the Crowe and Hartofilakidis classification systems for developmental dysplasia of the hip in adults. The anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis of 145 patients with 209 osteoarthritic hips were examined twice by three experienced hip surgeons from three European countries and the abnormal hips were rated using both classifications. The inter- and intra-observer agreement was calculated.</p>
<p>Interobserver reliability was evaluated using weighted and unweighted kappa coefficients and for the Crowe classification, among the three pairs there was a minimum kappa coefficient with linear weighting of 0.90 for observers A and C and a maximum kappa coefficient of 0.92 for observers B and C. For the Hartofilakidis classification, the minimum kappa value was 0.85 for observers A and B, and the maximum value was 0.93 for observers B and C. With regard to intra-observer reliability, the kappa coefficients with linear weighting between the two evaluations of the same observer ranged between 0.86 and 0.95 for the Crowe classification and between 0.80 and 0.93 for the Hartofilakidis classification.</p>
<p>The reliability of both systems was substantial to almost perfect both for serial measurements by individual readers and between different readers, although the information offered was dissimilar.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yiannakopoulos, C. K., Chougle, A., Eskelinen, A., Hodgkinson, J. P., Hartofilakidis, G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.19724</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] Inter- and intra-observer variability of the Crowe and Hartofilakidis classification systems for congenital hip disease in adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>583</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>579</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/424?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] Obesity in total hip replacement]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/424?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A prospective, multi-centre study was carried out on 1421 total hip replacements between January 1999 and July 2007 to examine if obesity has an effect on clinical outcomes.</p>
<p>The patients were categorised into three groups: non-obese (body mass index (BMI) &lt; 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>), obese (BMI 30 to 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) and morbidly obese (BMI &gt; 40 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). The primary outcome measure was the change in Oxford hip score at five years. Secondary outcome measures included dislocation and revision rates, increased haemorrhage, deep infection, deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, mean operating time and length of hospital stay. Radiological analysis assessing heterotopic ossification, femoral osteolysis and femoral stem positioning was performed. Data were incomplete for 362 hips (25.5%)</p>
<p>There was no difference in the change in the Oxford hip score, complication rates or radiological changes at five years between the groups. The morbidly obese group was significantly younger and required a significantly longer operating time. Obese and morbidly obese patients have as much to gain from total hip replacement as non-obese patients.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew, J. G., Palan, J., Kurup, H. V., Gibson, P., Murray, D. W., Beard, D. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20522</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] Obesity in total hip replacement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>429</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>424</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/430?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] The anatomically difficult primary total hip replacement: MEDIUM- TO LONG-TERM RESULTS USING A CEMENTLESS ODULAR STEM]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/430?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>This prospective study presents the ten-year (5 to 16) clinical and radiological results of 55 primary total hip replacements (THR) using a cementless modular femoral component (S-ROM). All patients had a significant anatomical abnormality which rendered the primary THR difficult.</p>
<p>The mean Harris hip score was 36 (12 to 72) pre-operatively, 83 (44 to 100) at five years, and 85 (45 to 99) at ten years. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and short-form (SF)-12 scores were recorded from the year 2000. The mean SF-12 score at five years after surgery was 45.24 (22.74 to 56.58) for the physical component and 54.14 (29.20 to 66.61) for the mental component. By ten years the SF-12 scores were 42.86 (21.59 to 58.95) and 51.03 (33.78 to 61.40), respectively. The mean WOMAC score at five years post-operatively was 25 (0 to 59), and at ten years was 27 (2 to 70).</p>
<p>No femoral components were radiologically loose, although five had osteolysis in Gruen zone 1, three had osteolysis in zone 7, and two showed osteolysis in both zones 1 and 7. No osteolysis was observed around or distal to the prosthetic sleeve. No femoral components were revised, although three hips underwent an acetabular revision and two required a liner exchange. At a mean of ten years&rsquo; follow-up the S-ROM femoral component implanted for an anatomically difficult primary THR has excellent clinical and radiological results.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biant, L. C., Bruce, W. J. M., Assini, J. B., Walker, P. M., Walsh, W. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19718</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] The anatomically difficult primary total hip replacement: MEDIUM- TO LONG-TERM RESULTS USING A CEMENTLESS ODULAR STEM]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>435</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>430</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/436?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: AN INDEPENDENT SERIES]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/436?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Few independent studies have reported the outcome of resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. The aim of this study was to report the five-year clinical outcome and seven-year survival of an independent series.</p>
<p>A total of 610 Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasties were performed in 532 patients with a mean age of 51.8 years (16.5 to 81.6). They were followed for between two and eight years; 107 patients (120 hips) had been followed up for more than five years. Two patients were lost to follow-up. At a minimum of five years&rsquo; follow-up, 79 of 85 hips (93%) had an excellent or good outcome according to the Harris hip score. The mean Oxford hip score was 16.1 points (<scp>sd</scp> 7.7) and the mean University of California Los Angeles activity score was 6.6 points (<scp>sd</scp> 1.9). There were no patients with definite radiological evidence of loosening or of narrowing of the femoral neck exceeding 10% of its width. There were 23 revisions (3.8%), giving an overall survival of 95% (95% confidence interval 85.3 to 99.2) at seven years. Fractured neck of femur in 12 hips was the most common indication for revision, followed by aseptic loosening in four. In three hips (three patients) (0.5%), failure was possibly related to metal debris.</p>
<p>Considering that these patients are young and active these results are good, and support the use of resurfacing. Further study is needed to address the early failures, particularly those related to fracture and metal debris.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steffen, R. T., Pandit, H. P., Palan, J., Beard, D. J., Gundle, R., McLardy-Smith, P., Murray, D. W., Gill, H. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19648</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: AN INDEPENDENT SERIES]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>441</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>436</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/442?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Hip] The blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction during resurfacing arthroplasty: A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES USING LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/4/442?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We used Laser Doppler flowmetry to measure the effect on the blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction of two surgical approaches during resurfacing arthroplasty. We studied 24 hips undergoing resurfacing arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. Of these, 12 had a posterior approach and 12 a trochanteric flip approach. A Laser probe was placed under radiological control in the superolateral part of the femoral head/neck junction. The Doppler flux was measured at stages of the operation and compared with the initial flux. In both groups the main fall in blood flow occurred during the initial exposure and capsulotomy of the hip joint.</p>
<p>There was a greater reduction in blood flow with the posterior (40%) than with the trochanteric flip approach (11%).</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amarasekera, H. W., Costa, M. L., Foguet, P., Krikler, S. J., Prakash, U., Griffin, D. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-03-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20050</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Hip] The blood flow to the femoral head/neck junction during resurfacing arthroplasty: A COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES USING LASER DOPPLER FLOWMETRY]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>445</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>442</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Hip</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>