<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk">
<title>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume Oncology</title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk</link>
<description>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume RSS feed -- recent Oncology articles</description>
<prism:publicationName>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0301-620X</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/9/1222?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/8/1084?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/8/1090?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume</title>
<url>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/9/1222?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Oncology] Peri-acetabular resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumours of the acetabulum]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/9/1222?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We treated 98 patients with peri-acetabular tumours by resection and reconstruction with a custom-made pelvic endoprosthesis. The overall survival of the patients was 67% at five years, 54% at ten years and 51% at 30 years. One or more complications occurred in 58.1% of patients (54), of which infection was the most common, affecting 30% (28 patients). The rate of local recurrence was 31% (29 patients) after a mean follow-up of 71 months (11 to 147). Dislocation occurred in 20% of patients (19). Before 1996 the rate was 40.5% (17 patients) but this was reduced to 3.9% (two patients) with the introduction of a larger femoral head. There were six cases of palsy of the femoral nerve with recovery in only two. Revision or excision arthroplasty was performed in 23.7% of patients (22), principally for uncontrolled infection or aseptic loosening. Higher rates of death, infection and revision occurred in men.</p>
<p>This method of treatment is still associated with high morbidity. Patients should be carefully selected and informed of this pre-operatively.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaiswal, P. K., Aston, W. J. S., Grimer, R. J., Abudu, A., Carter, S., Blunn, G., Briggs, T. W. R., Cannon, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.20758</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Oncology] Peri-acetabular resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction for tumours of the acetabulum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>9</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1227</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1222</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/8/1084?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Oncology] Endoprosthetic replacement for primary tumours around the knee: EXPERIENCE FROM PEKING UNIVERSITY]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/8/1084?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In developing countries locally-made low-cost prostheses are mainly used in limb-salvage surgery to alleviate the economic burden.</p>
<p>We retrospectively collected data on 104 patients treated by limb-salvage surgery between July 1997 and July 2005. We used a locally-designed and fabricated stainless-steel endoprosthesis in each case. Oncological and functional outcomes were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 47 months (12 to 118).</p>
<p>A total of 73 patients (70.2%) were free from disease, nine (8.7%) were alive with disease, 19 (18.2%) had died from their disease and three (2.9%) from unrelated causes. According to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scoring system, the mean functional score was 76.3% (SD 17.8). The five-year survival for the implant was 70.5%. There were nine cases (8.7%) of infection, seven early and two late, seven (6.7%) of breakage of the prosthesis, three (2.9%) of aseptic loosening and two (1.9%) of failure of the polyethylene bushing. Multivariate analysis showed that a proximal tibial prosthesis and a resection length of 14 cm or more were significant negative prognostic factors.</p>
<p>Our survival rates and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society functional scores are similar to those reported in the literature. Although longer follow-up is needed to confirm our results, we believe that a low-cost custom-made endoprosthesis is a cost-effective and reliable reconstructive option for limb salvage in developing countries.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guo, W., Ji, T., Yang, R., Tang, X., Yang, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20240</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Oncology] Endoprosthetic replacement for primary tumours around the knee: EXPERIENCE FROM PEKING UNIVERSITY]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1089</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1084</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/8/1090?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[[Oncology] Variability in the presentation of synovial sarcoma in children: A PLEA FOR GREATER AWARENESS]]></title>
<link>http://www.jbjs.org.uk/cgi/content/short/90-B/8/1090?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We have analysed the pattern of symptoms in patients presenting with synovial sarcoma to identify factors which led to long delays in diagnosis. In 35 children, the early symptoms and the results of clinical and radiological investigation were reviewed, along with the presumed diagnoses. The duration of symptoms was separated into patient delay and doctor delay.</p>
<p>Only half of the patients had one or more of the four clinical findings suggestive of sarcoma according to the guidance of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence at the onset of symptoms. Of the 33 children for whom data were available, 16 (48.5%) presented with a painless mass and in ten (30.3%) no mass was identified. Seven (21.2%) had an unexplained joint contracture. Many had been extensively investigated unsuccessfully. The mean duration of symptoms was 98 weeks (2 to 364), the mean patient delay was 43 weeks (0 to 156) and the mean doctor delay was 50 weeks (0 to 362). The mean number of doctors seen before referral was three (1 to 6) and for 15 patients the diagnosis was obtained after unplanned excision. Tumours around the knee and elbow were associated with a longer duration of symptoms and longer doctor delay compared with those at other sites. Delays did not improve significantly over the period of our study of 21 years, and we were unable to show that delay in diagnosis led to a worse prognosis.</p>
<p>Our findings highlight the variety of symptoms associated with synovial sarcoma and encourage greater awareness of this tumour as a potential diagnosis in childhood.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chotel, F., Unnithan, A., Chandrasekar, C. R., Parot, R., Jeys, L., Grimer, R. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-07-31</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.19815</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[[Oncology] Variability in the presentation of synovial sarcoma in children: A PLEA FOR GREATER AWARENESS]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>90-B</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1096</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1090</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Oncology</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>